Re: [PEPr] -1 for RFC::Error Handling Guidelines for PHP5

On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 13:20:02 +0100, Sergio Carvalho <sergio.carvalho@portugalmail.com> wrote: > Lukas Smith wrote: > > So anyway can we save ourselves the why now emails? Our goal is to make > > a decision on a very critical part. Expect it to be difficult. Expect it > > to be lengthy. Expect it to be changed later. We are doing opensource. > > We can afford to strive for the right thing (tm). > > > > At the same time lets try to find a working interim solution atleast. > > Whatever it maybe, nobody can claim to know the full effects of either > > decision just yet (however I claim to know that nobody knows the full > > effects ..). > > So true. We can all sit around, discuss the pros and cons of exceptions, > the all too many different prisms on the expected outcome of exception > usage within PHP, and do nothing for months. Or we can try one approach, > one that does not impose too many constraints, and see where we'll be > heading. The option of assigning alpha or beta states to RFCs is an > excellent solution to go along this path. > A quick comment about that. Would an RFC need to go through another comment and voting period to upgrade its status or to release a new version? > Cheers, > > Sérgio Carvalho > -- DB_DataObject_FormBuilder - The database at your fingertips http://pear.php.net/package/DB_DataObject_FormBuilder paperCrane --Justin Patrin--