Re: [PEPr] +1 for RDF::RDF

From: Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 10:40:13 +0000
Subject: Re: [PEPr] +1 for RDF::RDF
References: 1 2 3  Groups: php.pear.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-33107@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Martin Jansen wrote:
On Sat Aug 28, 2004 at 11:1036PM +0200, Lukas Smith wrote:
PEPr wrote:
According to the coding standards, classes like RDF_DBModel should be renamed to RDF_Model_DB.
I'm not sure there is such a passage in the coding standards, but I believe that my suggested naming scheme follows common sense: RDF_DBModel is a subclass of RDF_Model, which is indicated by naming it RDF_Model_DB.
The original RAP API also had a class "object" from which a bunch of classes where derived (statement, blanknode etc). I have stuck this class into RDF.php ... The class doesnt do much and I think it mainly existed for forward compatibility or something. What do people think about it? regards, Lukas

« previous php.pear.dev (#33107) next »