Re: [PEPr] Comment on Images::GraPHPite
| From: | Philippe Jausions | Date: | Wed, 01 Sep 2004 21:13:29 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [PEPr] Comment on Images::GraPHPite | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-33172@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Greg Beaver wrote:
Alan Knowles wrote:That's nice, but I think Alan was more refering to install of packages where only FTP is available. 98% of all the installation I do for clients are FTP only, with no access to shell... In this case, parameters and package constants are the most flexible to configure the package. -PhilippeThis unfortunatly makes 'pearball' very difficult to implement most software installations I now do, I download a prebuild pear folder and install it into a subdirectory of the application (then add it to the include_path for the app). - This ensures that I dont accidently break client applications when upgrading a global pear install (which even with our BC rules still continues to happen, albeit a little less often..). Regards AlanEach app should have its own private pear installation anyway (i.e. a custom config file) to take advantage of replacements properly. Then you can set the private pear installation sooner in the include_path. I hope to make this even easier to do when pear actually supports applications in the future. i.e. instead of having to manually create the config, something like: $ pear --application=myapp configure-app /path/to/local/pear