Re: Net_FTP design issues

From: Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 16:57:30 +0000
Subject: Re: Net_FTP design issues
References: 1 2 3  Groups: php.pear.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-33856@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On Oct 14, 2004, at 11:48 AM, Tobias Schlitt wrote:
Hi Paul M Jones! On 10/14/2004 09:51 AM you wrote:
I would favor the OO approach, but that's just me. I'm afraid I don't understand the procedural argument; you could, for example, give the OO version static methods that can be called like plain functions (Net_FTP::connect() and so on). Then you have the best of both worlds.
The benefit of a procedural version would be, that users who do not have (for whatever reason, eg. restrictive provider,....) the FTP ext, can just run scripts depending on it, as if it was there.
That is a good idea and a worthy goal. :-) It sounds kind of PHP_Compat-ish ... would you think Net_FTP could be hooked into it somehow? -- Paul M. Jones Savant: the simple alternative to Smarty for PHP. http://phpsavant.com/ DB_Table: build RDBMS tables and XHTML forms in one PHP class. http://wiki.ciaweb.net/yawiki/index.php?area=DB_Table Yawiki: a collaborative online documentation system. http://yawiki.com/ Yawp: a single-file foundation for PHP applications. http://phpyawp.com/

« previous php.pear.dev (#33856) next »