Re: Difference of levels for maintainers
| From: | Klaus Guenther | Date: | Tue, 26 Oct 2004 18:50:13 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Difference of levels for maintainers | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-34081@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Greg Beaver <cellog@php.net> wrote:
> Klaus Guenther wrote:
> > Andrew Nagy <asnagy@webitecture.org> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>I apologize if this is a blatantly dumb question, but I can't find
> >>anywhere a descriptions of the difference in levels of package
> >>maintainers. Can someone post a description or send me a link to where
> >>it might be?
> >
> >
> > I'm not sure if there's an _official_ listing of them, but here are my
> > definitions ;)
> >
> > - lead: has authority to roll a release, is fully responsible for the
> > package.
> > - dev: someone who regularly contributes to the package.
> developer, not dev :)
Nice catch :) I was working with the pearweb dropdown box on the "edit
maintainers" form.
> > - helper: someone who occasionally contributes major patches, or who has
> > contributed something of extraordinary value.
> - contributor: someone who has at one time contributed stuff.
Hmm... this is missing from the pearweb "edit maintainer" form.
> The only role that has any significance for the release process is lead,
> as no other role can release a new version of a package. All the others
> are for thanking those who do the work, or other non-technical listing
> reasons.
>
> Greg
>
>