Re: Re: RFC Postal Routing Package - example

From: Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2004 11:37:35 +0000
Subject: Re: Re: RFC Postal Routing Package - example
References: 1 2 3 4 5  Groups: php.pear.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-35224@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Hello Matt, Matt K wrote:
Daniel Khan wrote:
I can see the sense in this when it comes to updating the DB. But what happens if someone wants the DB running on a separate machine? OK, it'll make the whole import/export stuff more complicated, and stuff like soundex isn't available in every DB (it is in MySQL, Postgres AFAIK via a contrib extension). But it seems to me PEAR is all about that kind of flexibility.
I understand what you mean but this usage seems so perfect for SQLite. E.g. we have writes 4x/year the other time we have reads. The updates are rare enough to use replication (rsync) if you have different machines. Yes - I confess I am SQLite fan. But yes - this is lack of flexibilty on the other hand. Greetings -- Daniel Khan Technische Leitung Geschäftsführender Gesellschafter Ventigo Werbung . IT . Marketing GmbH Kornstrasse 10 4060 Leonding T. +43 (0) 732 37 09 60 | F. +43 (0) 732 37 09 60 10 http://www.ventigo.com | office@ventigo.com

« previous php.pear.dev (#35224) next »