Re: Re: [pear-webmaster] Re: Help with installing PEAR

Hello Greg, >>The answer I'd like to hear is - what do you need to do to solve that >>problem and why can't I do that? >> GB> You need to talk to Edin, who has the only copy of the windows build, GB> and you need to also modify pearweb/public_html/go-pear, and also the Revision of go-pear in pearweb/public_html is # $Id: go-pear,v 1.72 2004/12/03 20:37:16 cellog Exp $ one from PHP 4.3.10 distributuve is # $Id: go-pear,v 1.57 2004/02/15 00:49:10 pajoye Exp $ In addition it doesn't have any branches. =/ Also I was unable to find other go-pear.php copies in repository. GB> list of bundled packages in a script found in php-src/pear, pear-core, GB> both HEAD and PEAR_1_3 branches, and you also need to coordinate with GB> Pierre-Alain, who is the primary contact from the PEAR end, and with GB> Wez, who is the king of windows builds of PHP. It's much more of a GB> political than a coding headache. Well, there are a lot of scripts actually and I haven't found any references to go-pear.php in them. Sent a letter to PHP QAT for now. GB> The point is we have a number of good coders who disagree about the GB> quality of the patches in question. Now perhaps you are really saying GB> that the coders who are already in PEAR simply aren't as good as you GB> are, and that I can accept as an argument. You probably won't get GB> anywhere with that one though :). Well, if everybody equal when why I still don't have a PEAR account? =) >> >>Art need freedom to evolve. Not rules. No patents. >> GB> You are free to develop in a vacuum. PEAR is not a vacuum. Your art GB> can become better, and you can enhance others work with gentle GB> suggestions, or make enemies and waste bandwidth with FUD, it's your choice. Without critics every team is condemned to self-admiration. I accept critics. Do you? t --