Re: [PEPr] Comment on File Formats::pOOcl

> Is there something wrong with Archive_Tar? I think the main advantage of poocl is its design, very object oriented, that lets you do a lot of things with a few lines of code. Does archive_tar allow you to do something else with your tar than writing it to a file? With pOOcl, the tar archive goes to a writer that could be basically anything (send to user, by mail, to a file...) > Perhaps this energy could be better spent getting Archive_Zip into a > releasable state. I did a Zip writer, basically reading the Archive_Zip. I tried creating a Zip reader, but this seems complex. I'm not sure I'm the right person to do that 0:) -- Vincent