[PEPr] Comment on Web Services::Services_Safari

From: Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2005 18:21:37 +0000
Subject: [PEPr] Comment on Web Services::Services_Safari
References: 1  Groups: php.pear.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-36595@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Stoyan Stefanov (http://pear.php.net/user/stoyan) has commented on the proposal for Web Services::Services_Safari. Comment: Martin: Thanks, I'll look into this. Ian:Yes, that is a bit of a concern. I was thinking that the naming convention of the PEAR services-related packages should be probably revised. It seems to me that the number of such packages is increasing steadily and can become harder to manage. My idea was to use the service provider name in the package name. Like: Web_Services::Service_Provider_ServiceName In my case the Safari service is provided by O'Reilly, so a better name would be: Web_Services::Services_Oreilly_Safari Same goes for the Google packages for example. Currently there is one approved and one proposed Google packages. Using a common prefix will probably make it easier to grasp what a package is about. Proposal information: http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-proposal-show.php?id=222 -- Sent by PEPr, the automatic proposal system at http://pear.php.net

« previous php.pear.dev (#36595) next »