Re: [rfc] new coding standar rules

Lukas Smith wrote: > > Uhm yeah lets over regulate even more ... Some people really wants to follow a strict convention (me for example). People says that PEAR coding standars are not good, but from time to time I'm seeing proyects adopting it and marking that as a feature. > I think we all agree that everybody has their own style ... > This is not something you can just change in a snap or is it something > people want to do. > > Come on I can see this making things easier to read but on such a small > scale its not worth it. > > 1) create a converter (the guy that proposes the most rules has to write > it ;) ) hehe. A converter would be nice, sure, but I don't see anyone writing it. My humble contribution to that is attached: a tab to spaces converter and strip trailing whitespaces. > 2) make coding recommendations (and if you must make them endlessly > long) > That is exactly what I'm proposing: a "recommendations chapter". I have seen many people asking what is the convention for X thing. Tomas V.V.Cox