Re: Re: New header block questions
| From: | Ian Eure | Date: | Tue, 29 Mar 2005 04:45:41 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: New header block questions | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-36922@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Monday 28 March 2005 07:58 pm, Greg Beaver wrote:
> Ian Eure wrote:
> > I'm looking at moving to the new header blocks for my packages, and I
> > have a few questions about the new blocks.
> >
> > - Can two @version tags exist in the same docblock, one for package
> > version and one for CVS version?
>
> Yes. @version doesn't do anything but display the stuff you pass to it.
>
What about using $Revision$?
> So, there is the reasoning - it is similar to the reason that we use var
> $blah; inside class definitions for uninitialized variables - so the
> parser doesn't make assumptions and emit warnings.
>
That's unfortunate, but understandable. I think it may lead to confusion
during license switches, as it's more likely that a @license tag will be
missed.
Attachment: [application/pgp-signature]
Attachment: [application/pgp-signature]