Re: XML_Tree

Ok, But somebody must take a stand. I vote we release v2 with a big fat warning. All depending packages need to be updated too. It's insane just keeping it like this - might as well not have the class at all, or use my own. Quoting Helgi Þormar <helgi@trance.is>: > On Fri, 2005-04-22 at 15:41 +0200, Willo van der Merwe wrote: > > Could we release XML_Tree? It's been in RC2 for almost a year now. > > Nope we can't v2 breaks BC and we are kind stuck in a loop in regards > what to do. > > Many users are using v2 even tho it's beta and we can't move it to > XML_Tree2 since then it would break to much for existing users when they > upgrade ... > > Well anyway it has been discussed what to do and no solution was found, > so it has to stay like this until we know what to do. > > Any QA/Developer knows what to do ?! Speak up then, I ran few ideas with > Davey the other day and he came up with few but the conclusion was that > none of them would at least give half of XML_Tree users a hard time when > upgrading :/ > > - Helgi > >