Re: XML_Tree

On Fri, 2005-04-22 at 17:53 +0200, willo@mirasol.co.za wrote: > Ok, But somebody must take a stand. I vote we release v2 with a big fat > warning. All depending packages need to be updated too. It's insane just > keeping it like this - might as well not have the class at all, or use my own. Thing is, if you have XML_Tree v2 installed and we release XML_Tree2 and you try to upgrade then you either get "no new upgrade" or get "upgraded" to XML_Tree v1 I'll try to raise this issue at A'dam PHPConf in beginning of May and see if I get any results ... The best thing is to release XML_Tree2 ... but like I said, we have to find out if there are other ways or even something we could do to make the blow softer ... Time will tell. - Helgi > Quoting Helgi Þormar <helgi@trance.is>: > > > On Fri, 2005-04-22 at 15:41 +0200, Willo van der Merwe wrote: > > > Could we release XML_Tree? It's been in RC2 for almost a year now. > > > > Nope we can't v2 breaks BC and we are kind stuck in a loop in regards > > what to do. > > > > Many users are using v2 even tho it's beta and we can't move it to > > XML_Tree2 since then it would break to much for existing users when they > > upgrade ... > > > > Well anyway it has been discussed what to do and no solution was found, > > so it has to stay like this until we know what to do. > > > > Any QA/Developer knows what to do ?! Speak up then, I ran few ideas with > > Davey the other day and he came up with few but the conclusion was that > > none of them would at least give half of XML_Tree users a hard time when > > upgrading :/ > > > > - Helgi > > > > > > >