Re: Re: PEAR Karma

You've got Karma ;) Regards Alan On Mon, 2005-04-25 at 13:17 -0700, louis@mulliemedia.com wrote: > Your justifications sound good -- of course, I'd agree to anything PEAR has to say ;) > I'll add the Text_ prefix to all my class names. Are there any other concerns ? > > Regards > Louis > > P.-S. : Sorry for the so late reply. I've been having all sorts of DNS problems > with my host. > > Alan Knowles wrote: > > >On Fri, 2003-04-11 at 17:18 -0400, Louis Mullie wrote: > > > >I think you need to fix you mailer..? (this was posted in 2003 ;) > > > > > >>I agree on having the package in the Text category and I understand the > >>confusion it would've caused to place it in the PHP category. However, > >>I do not think that we should name it Text_Lexer : firstly, the package > >>lexes anything, not only text; > > > > > >I could not find the document which mentioned it, but from memory the > >reasons for not doing top level packages: > >- Had to have an over-riding justification for not prefixing category. > > > >It's also pretty usefull as all PECL packages dont use _ in the name, so > >you dont end up clashing if someone ever writes a Lexer extension.. > > > >>secondly, since this package needs its > >>own directory due to the number of files, the naming convention > >>would be respected with "Lexer"; finally, class names become > >>quite long (i.e., Text_Lexer_Generator_Regex ...), but this is a > > > >I win.. HTML_Template_Flexy_Compiler_Flexy_Tags > > > >Does Text_Lexer_Generator_Regex get exposed to the end user or is it > >just internal? > > > >This is rarely a concern, we only listen to that argument when you get > >to 3 levels in the class name ;) > > > >Regards > >Alan > > > >>simply aesthetical concern. > >> > >>What do you guys think ? > >> > >>- Louis > >> > >>Martin Jansen wrote: > >> > >>>On Thu Apr 07, 2005 at 02:0958PM +0800, Alan Knowles wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>>>We didnt really get anywhere on the naming thing, Calling it Text_Lexer, > >>>>and sticking it in the Text category seemed alot clearer to me, the only > >>>>thing similar in the PHP category is PHP_Parser, which only parses > >>>>PHP.. > >>>> > >>>>Views/Comments etc. would help... > >>>> > >>>> > >>>I agree. > >>> > >>>- Martin > >>> > >>> > >>> >