Re: PEAR Karma
| From: | Louis Mullie | Date: | Fri, 11 Apr 2003 21:18:16 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: PEAR Karma | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-37175@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
I agree on having the package in the Text category and I understand the
confusion it would've caused to place it in the PHP category. However,
I do not think that we should name it Text_Lexer : firstly, the package
lexes anything, not only text; secondly, since this package needs its
own directory due to the number of files, the naming convention
would be respected with "Lexer"; finally, class names become
quite long (i.e., Text_Lexer_Generator_Regex ...), but this is a
simply aesthetical concern.
What do you guys think ?
- Louis
Martin Jansen wrote:
On Thu Apr 07, 2005 at 02:0958PM +0800, Alan Knowles wrote:We didnt really get anywhere on the naming thing, Calling it Text_Lexer, and sticking it in the Text category seemed alot clearer to me, the only thing similar in the PHP category is PHP_Parser, which only parses PHP.. Views/Comments etc. would help...I agree. - Martin