Re: Re: Publicly listed channels

Tomas V.V.Cox wrote: >Lukas Smith wrote: > >> Let me elaborate quickly. Anything we put into the installer is on some >> level endorsed by us. So we should take care about what channels we >> accept. At the same time we should base this decision not so much on the >> technical quality, but more on if we except this channel to stick >> around, if we trust the owners to not publish malicous code etc. We >> obviously cant gurantee that the owner will not publish malicous code. > >I'd let that channels-listing site to a third party guys. We can't >confuse people pointing them to channels out of PEAR/PECL where we have >no control and no QA. Btw, it shouldn't be our task to review, >calibrate or recommend code developed out of here and even worse to >track it along the time. I agree with this. Bertrand Mansion Mamasam