Re: Publicly listed channels
| From: | Tomas V.V.Cox | Date: | Mon, 11 Apr 2005 16:41:50 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Publicly listed channels | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-37172@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Lukas Smith wrote:
Let me elaborate quickly. Anything we put into the installer is on some level endorsed by us. So we should take care about what channels we accept. At the same time we should base this decision not so much on the technical quality, but more on if we except this channel to stick around, if we trust the owners to not publish malicous code etc. We obviously cant gurantee that the owner will not publish malicous code.I'd let that channels-listing site to a third party guys. We can't confuse people pointing them to channels out of PEAR/PECL where we have no control and no QA. Btw, it shouldn't be our task to review, calibrate or recommend code developed out of here and even worse to track it along the time. Just IMHO. Tomas V.V.Cox Others experiences: http://linux.duke.edu/projects/yum/repos/