Re: Considering package proposal: Cgiapp

On Sun, 2005-04-10 at 22:23 -0400, Matthew Weier O'Phinney wrote: > The class' usefulness is primarily in providing a solid framework for building > reusable web applications. As an example, where I work we have created a > Cgiapp-derived superclass that handles authentication, placement of content in a > sitewide template, configuration of sitewide content on a per-application level, > etc.; all applications then derive from this superclass, which gives them a > common framework. Applications can also be easily extended; as an example, I > extended a basic image gallery class to create an ecards class. You just said it here, it's a framework and PEAR isn't a place for framework, just look at the yawp proposal ... It will never be accepted, at least in it's current form (Tho I'm doubtful even tho it will change since it's essentially a framework) - Helgi