Re: reminder: package.xml 2.0 question

On 6/8/2005 6:30 AM, Greg Beaver spake the following words: > To help the PEAR package developers make an informed decision on the > matter, please vote as follows in the old-fashioned +1 manner for one of > the following (or suggest another solution): > ---- > #1: breaking BC in package.xml 2.0 > ---- > #2: not breaking BC at all, keep things the way they are. > ---- > #3: keeping BC in package.xml 2.0, and adding package.xml 2.1 to the spec +1 for #3 However, if it really is too much work,I'd go for #1, too. But given our stance on BC, I don't think it's *that* great an idea. On the other hand, package.xml 2.0 is still in alpha status, but is being used in stable releases. That's not such a brilliant idea imho, but what's done is done. So let's adopt #3. If that means we can't release 1.4 till Christmas, so be it. Btw, I just realized how much I miss the old pear-dev votes ;) Klaus