Re: reminder: package.xml 2.0 question
| From: | Lukas Smith | Date: | Wed, 08 Jun 2005 17:30:53 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: reminder: package.xml 2.0 question | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-38032@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Greg Beaver wrote:
Hi, I posted a question regarding the change to package.xml 2.0. Does everyone feel it is a functional and not a cosmetic change to break BC by wrapping maintainers in the <maintainers> tag? Remember:one thing though .. we should try and document decisions on the xml format so that we dont repeat discussions .. for example we had a discussion which concluded we want to try and not use attributes. I remember there was a discussion, but I dont remember the arguments about why we went with <lead> versus <maintainer>+<role> .. regards, Lukas