Re: [PEPr] -1 for RFC::[QA-Core] Refine orphan proposal process

On 7/7/05 3:35 PM Pacific Time, Daniel Convissor (danielc@analysisandsolutions.com) wrote: > Time frames are WAY WAY WAY too short. I disagree (speaking from a position of someone who has a draft proposal out there that would be nuked by this new process) ... I believe that if you're not ready to propose something and move it through the process in this timeframe, then don't propose it. Even seeing this proposal come up for votes is serving as a good kick in the pants for me to finish up my Services_Backpack package. Too often people put something in Draft stage to "reserve" their potential position for working on a new package, and then do nothing ... If the proposers truly aren't motivated to see a package through to release, then I'm all for booting the proposal and letting someone else pick up the ball with a new proposal for a similar idea. +1 -Clay -- Killersoft.com