Re: Performance question + new packages?

On 7/15/05, Arnold Daniels <arnold@bean-it.nl> wrote: > HI all, > > I've got some performance issues some of you might recognize. I've build > a number of classes (I will make a pear package and propose it when it > is all finished) which are loaded on each page. Including all these > files takes up quite some time, about 250ms, without executing any code, > accept declaring classes of course. When a page normally loads in 250ms > and now become 500ms, it feels sluggy instead of fast. > > I can imagine a project build with a lot of pear packages should run > into the same issues. I was thinking about perhaps using ACP or some > other cacher. But does anyone have some other ideas. > > [...] Hi Arnold, speaking about HTML_QuickForm: when using such packages you usually aims to quickly developing, without so much care for performaces & layout customizations. Typical usages are backoffice, admin interfaces, etc. So I can't understand what are you proposing: another form generation package, with a focus on speed instead vs. versatility (as Cache_Lite vs Cache)? Or a different implementation with all the features of html_quickform but better optimization? In the second case you might want to collaborate with html_quickform mantainers to improve the existing (html_quickform2 ?), istead of committing a new package - just to avoid overlap. Regards, Luca