Re: QuickFormController design change idea/request

I actually did reply earlier, but had hit reply instead of reply to all by accident. Here's what I wrote earlier -> I wouldn't create a new proposal for something that already exists in PEAR:: http://pear.php.net/package/HTTP_Session If M3 is supported it will grow. If not, then M3 will continue to use Java and .NET - you recommended that I switch to full OO language in your response. You are basically saying I should switch to Java. It isn't surpising that PHP isn't taken seriously in the enterprise based on this sort of attitude. You need to support M3 more, not less, and not discount it because you think it isn't a lot of people. That is short sighted. Besides you could add support for session abstraction without making it mandatory - use it if you need it but otherwise don't. But that would require a desire to address the issue rather than dismiss it.. On 8/1/05, Justin Patrin <papercrane@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 8/1/05, Alexey Borzov <borz_off@cs.msu.su> wrote: > > Also H_QF_Controller package is definitely not the place for having a > generic > > session abstraction mechanism. So if you'd like to implement such a > mechanism, > > you'll need to propose a new package for such abstraction. I sincerely > doubt > > this proposal will make it through, though. > > > > It surprises me that noone has mentions HTTP_Session in this > conversation. Not only has something already been done, it's already > in PEAR. > > -- > Justin Patrin > -- -- Matt Friedman