Re: New Package Questions
| From: | Alan Knowles | Date: | Thu, 11 Aug 2005 00:24:36 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: New Package Questions | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-39307@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Care to explain what exactly it is, the website is full of marketing
bumf...
Any idea why someone would use u2/redback?
(I'm guessing it's to interface with an existing legacy system)
>From the looks of things u2 is some kind of database? - redback being
some kind of object layer ontop of it.
It may end up being DB_U2.. - but then again, somebody might think that
was a database of U2 songs ;)
Regards
Alan
On Wed, 2005-08-10 at 23:38 +1000, Gordon Heydon wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am a new PEAR developer and I am about to start the process of
> contributing a class that allows PHP to communicate with IBM's U2
> product RedBack which allows web integration with their PICK clones
> UniData and UniVerse. (see
> http://www-306.ibm.com/software/data/u2/) for
> more information.
>
> Over the last couple of weeks I have been converting my code to the PEAR
> coding standards and starting to document the API for other people to
> use. Maybe one my biggest issues is the naming of my class and the
> section that it should be included in.
>
> The working title for my class is redback, but because RedBack in a
> registered Trademark owned by IBM I am fairly certain that I cannot use
> it. As the other RedBack gateways for ASP and JSP are redpages and
> redbeans respectively. I was thinking something along the same lines
> like redbird (from the covers of the O'Reilly PHP pocket book) or
> something like that. Another option would be to call it New_RedBack, but
> I am not sure if this would be against the trademark.
>
> The section that I think it should go into is Networking, but I just
> want to make sure before I create the draft proposal as I am not sure if
> I can change the name or sections.
>
> I was also looking are some of the current draft proposals, some of
> theme have been in the process for quite a while, is this normal? Can
> you take a while to complete the draft proposal before it is moved into
> Proposed?
>
> I also noticed that some did not have any links to code. Is the Draft
> period used to bring together all the required documentation and code
> together before the proposal is moved into the Proposed Status.
>
> Also I would like to hear any tips from people who have successfully
> gotten a niche package into PEAR as I do feel that my biggest hurdle
> will be getting the votes to get it finally submitted.
>
> Thanks in advance for any assistance that can be offered.
> Gordon.
>