Re: Re: Questions about PEAR
| From: | Helgi Þormar | Date: | Fri, 26 Aug 2005 02:52:40 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: Questions about PEAR | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-39570@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Fri, 2005-08-26 at 00:11 +0200, Lukas Smith wrote:
> >> 2.do you follow the UML standard and is there going to be UML models (Class Diagram)
> >> about PEAR?
>
> I dont even know what "follow the UML standard" is supposed to mean. UML
> is just a way to visualise code and its relations in different ways.
> That being said providing UML diagrams, ER-Diagrams etc fall into the
> area of documentation that every maintainer/documentor can decide on
> themselves. Especially since we have packages with wide ranges of
> different complexity levels.
Well there are UML specs created by OMG, which could be translated as a
standard.
http://www.uml.org/
Not that it matters all that much, if one creates UML for his/her
package then it's always a safe bet to create a jpg/png of the UML for
users to view, and maybe include the project file for the UML (umbrella
or similar UML file) so that other maintainers can make alterations to
the UML.
The sentence above is all what I think and is by no means documented no
where :)
- Helgi