Re: in search for XML-RPC developers/maintainers contact

Edgar Soldin wrote: > Hello Anatoly, > > I am kind of confused. In between I am in contact with Daniel. As for > now, I will deliver him some patches against the current source of > extensions I wrote to the pear xmplrpc package. > Anyway, I am interested in the background of your phrase "Well, it is my > IMHO". What do you mean by that? Would you tell me about it? Are you > actually advising me to use another xmlrpc package out of reasons in > functionality or politics? It would be very kind of you to tell me about it. If you are using PHP5, you may try out XML_RPC2, which has been for ages waiting Daniel's review. It does not use eval, and hence does not suffer from the security problems: http://pear.sergiocarvalho.com/XML_RPC2-0.0.3.tgz As an aside: At what point can we call PEAR too bureaucratic? XML_RPC2 saw the first idea float around pear-dev 10 months ago(!), and since then has spent over four months waiting for various kinds of approvals and reviews... Regards, -- Sérgio Carvalho