Re: Re: in search for XML-RPC developers/maintainers contact

Hey Folks: On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 01:36:15PM +0100, Sergio Carvalho wrote: > > As an aside: At what point can we call PEAR too bureaucratic? XML_RPC2 > saw the first idea float around pear-dev 10 months ago(!), and since > then has spent over four months waiting for various kinds of approvals > and reviews... To everyone, I apologize for taking so long on this. I have been extremely consumed with more pressing matters. I have looked at some of the package, but not the whole thing. What I said to Sergio in my most recent comments is overall, I think he has a lot of good ideas, but I don't think it's ready for prime time yet. As far as PEAR being too bureaucratic. Bureaucratic, yes, it can be. But too bureaucratic, I don't think so. Most packages go through fairly easily. When it comes to majorly important packages, like XML_RPC, it's important to get things right. Thanks, --Dan -- T H E A N A L Y S I S A N D S O L U T I O N S C O M P A N Y data intensive web and database programming http://www.AnalysisAndSolutions.com/ 4015 7th Ave #4, Brooklyn NY 11232 v: 718-854-0335 f: 718-854-0409