Re: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] System_SharedMemory-0.0.4 (beta) Released.

I think it ok as it is! What's the point in having the CS if it is "just when you get around to do it", it is better to say that from first release you should comply with CS. As, I think it was, Justin said, the CS learning curve is not very steep and most packages are only a few classes, so changing the code to comply should not be such a big deal. I think there should be no excuse not to comply with CS as the general rule. /Jesper > Arnaud Limbourg wrote: >>>>What are the feeling of PEAR QA in this respect? >>> >>> >>>Actually, I think you're right. If the release does not conform to CS >>>then QA should pull it. >> >> >> CS being a minimum requirement I pulled the release. >> >> Please fix the CS issues and re-release thank you > > No harsh words intended (the tone may sound a bit dry :) > > I know it might seem anal to pull a release for CS issues. If the > community thinks this is too much then we can think about different ways > of doing things. > > Arnaud. > > -- > PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/) > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > >