Re: PHP License for PEAR packages
| From: | Arnaud Limbourg | Date: | Mon, 03 Oct 2005 15:05:57 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: PHP License for PEAR packages | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-40060@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
AFAIK, there is work in progress to solve that issue. Stay tuned.
Arnaud.
Piotr Roszatycki wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Today my packages with PEAR modules was rejected from incoming queue. The
> reason is that PHP License was used for PEAR library.
>
> My question: is it possible to relicense the PEAR modules or to clarify the
> PHP License?
>
> The full text of reject reason is following:
>
> =======================================================
>
> Hi Maintainer,
>
> Im sorry but I need to reject this package out of NEW.
>
> The reason for this decision is the license which does not really fit
> the package. You package a php thing, either an addon "library" or a
> php "application" which uses the PHP license. Unfortunately for you
> this license can't really be used with anything else except PHP itself.
>
> It always only talks about "the product PHP", not about software.
> And "php-whatever" (or how the actual software may be called) isnt really
> "PHP" from the PHP group.
>
> Point 6 (in version 3 of the license, Point 5 in the older version 2) is
> also an advertisement clause. Bad thing which is usually discouraged.
>
> And, at the end there is the following text:
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> This software consists of voluntary contributions made by many
> individuals on behalf of the PHP Group.
>
> The PHP Group can be contacted via Email at group@php.net.
>
> For more information on the PHP Group and the PHP project,
> please see <http://www.php.net>.
>
> This product includes the Zend Engine, freely available at
> <http://www.zend.com>.
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> I doubt that your package is made "on behalf of the PHP group".
> Or that it includes the Zend Engine.
>
> As a good solution for this I suggest to talk to your upstream.
> Looking at the license they choosed they do want to make it available
> for everyone, so I suggest to use either the original BSD license
> or the LGPL.
>
> As soon as this is fixed you are of course free to reupload the package.
>
>