Re: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] ScriptReorganizer-0.3.0 (alpha) Released.
| From: | bertrand Gugger | Date: | Tue, 08 Nov 2005 08:02:40 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] ScriptReorganizer-0.3.0 (alpha) Released. | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-40397@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Pierre Joye wrote:
What's about giving the approval tasks to pear-qa instead of pear-group? I do not think we have always either the time or the background (we do not follow each proposal/thread/fud) to safely approve packages. As a bonus side, it will increase the process transparency. I doubt QA has more time or more background ...Anyway, I agree a last revision of the package before first release should be necessary, and that it is a QA task. Not necessarly done by QA as they are very few active, but QA could delegate to any dev who is concerned or has already reviewed the package. The technical question of Lukas is another point: we should refuse any new package installing on pear's root, a category should be obligatory. -- toggg