Re: [PEPr] Comment on Math::Math_Polynomial (Re-proposal)

Cooool. Way to go Etienne. :-) I'm curious as to what people would look for in an API to the Math_Derivative package? Any suggestions? Etienne: What did you have in mind for an API? Parameter/return value is a string? Parameter is some new type/generic Math_Equation object? I had actually looked at making a Math_Derivative package as well, but I wanted to get the Polynomial package through first so I don't spread myself too thin. When Etienne's Math_Derivative package gets accepted (or if something happens I'll write my own and propose it later, but it sounds like Etienne has a good start on it) I can change Math_Polynomial to depend on this package to eliminate duplicate functionality, and it shouldn't require a change to the Math_Polynomial API at all. - Keith Etienne Kneuss wrote .. > Hi, > > I'm currently on a draft about it. It should be available in a few days. > > > Matthew Fonda wrote: > > >Matthew Fonda (http://pear.php.net/user/mfonda) has commented on the proposal > for Math::Math_Polynomial (Re-proposal). > > > >Comment: > > > >I would still like to see a separate Math_Derivative package to handle > all > >derivatives, not just polynomials, but I suppose right now that isn't > too > >important, just something to think about for the future. > > > > > > > >-- Matthew > > > >Proposal information: > >http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-proposal-show.php?id=332 > > > > > > > > > -- > Etienne Kneuss > > http://www.colder.ch/ > colder@php.net > > -- > PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/) > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php