Re: [PEPr] Proposal for Logging::Log4P
| From: | Arnaud Limbourg | Date: | Wed, 28 Dec 2005 06:05:12 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [PEPr] Proposal for Logging::Log4P | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-40844@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Michael Kahn wrote:
> Hi Arnaud:
>
> I use it in a deployed PHP5 production environment currently (as well as
> a PHP4 environment). The unit tests are in PHPUnit2, so it's
> developed/tested in PHP5 as well. I develop in a Fedora Core 4
> environment.
Excellent!
> Someone on the comment page suggested 'Log_Static' as a better package
> name. I agree, since the current name might draw some flak from the
> Apache group (at the very least, since I found yet another, unlreated
> Log4P on the phpclasses site). Though I might personally prefer a more
> terse package name like 'LogS'--the short name has a certain
> laziness-appeal that encourages logging. You'll note in the docs that I
> aliased Log4P::warning() to Log4P::warn() - lazy!
> Supposing people do want the name changed - how do I go about doing that
> once the proposal has been submitted (my own codebase aside)?
I'm afraid they would have to update their code. I believe any editor
can do the auto completion that makes the short name largely irrelevant :)
Arnaud.