Re: Re: [PEPr] -1 for RFC::Package CVS/Package Web Access Sync

Hello Sergio, >> Could it be that you guys misinterpreted Anatoly's proposal? If I got >> him right, he is suggesting that the CVS karma file (on cvs.php.net) is >> automagically synchronized with the karma database table that is used on >> pear.php.net. In practice this means that whenever developers get CVS >> write access to a package, they also become a (lead?) maintainer of the >> package. >> >> Or is it my interpretation that is bogus? SC> The proposal text is: SC> «How about to give pearweb maintainer/lead status automatically to SC> developers, who already have package CVS access?» SC> Besides being extremely short for an RFC, I'd say this is a proposal to SC> give any PEAR developer (anyone with CVS access to PEAR) lead status on SC> pearweb (the project). SC> Your interpretation is something I'd vote +1. It seems bureaucratic to SC> have pearweb manage permissions and then have developers go ask for CVS SC> karma to be set manually. Unfortunately, that's not what is on the RFC text. Yep. Once set bureacracy is unbeatable. =) t --