Re: Interface naming standards?

hi, Foo_Bar_IFooBar imho this is the most common form if you want to indicate interfaces in the name. i've seen this in many languages. Foo_Bar_FooBarInterface is stupid if you use typehints, because you have to type it pretty often and method signatures getting pretty long. Foo_Bar_FooBar is often a lazy solution if you start with an implementation called Foo_Bar_FooBar but need an interface afterwards. Foo_Bar_FooBar turns into an interface so the typehints don't change and the implementation turns into something like Foo_Bar_(Default|Simple|Special)FooBar. because pear is a library and the stable releases should be thought-out i tend to Foo_Bar_IFooBar. elias