Re: PEAR's mission statement - let the fun begin

Can there be a policy that if you comment on a post that you don't delete the rest of the comment, what you have deleted makes my comment seem out of context and indeed a bit harsh. I went on to explain in that post and subsequent posts what the reason of saying this was. I would also count PEAR as a product - it is a lot of packages that if used correctly together can basically be called a Framework, excuse my naivety but there doesn't seem a massive difference. Amir Mohammad Saied wrote:

Hi, Ian Warner wrote:

I agree with this - PEAR being more open is one of my points. I mentioned before that I think PEAR should dictate what PACKAGES it wants, i.e. in the package list should be all the packages that need to be coded - not the other way round of people proposing them.

Pardon?! what do you mean with PEAR should dictate what packages it wants?! Here is a Repository not a product like ZF which lacks some packages and is trying to fill the gaps. -- Amir Mohammad