Re: [PEPr] +1 for Networking::Net_URL_Mapper
| From: | Bertrand Mansion | Date: | Sat, 17 Feb 2007 14:44:16 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [PEPr] +1 for Networking::Net_URL_Mapper | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-45657@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Le 17 févr. 07 à 14:49, David Coallier a écrit :
David Coallier (http://pear.php.net/user/davidc) has voted +1 on the proposal for Networking::Net_URL_Mapper.
Good work, however it is not fully phpdocumented. For instance I looked at Path.phps and there is other files and also Part.phpsI will publish usage examples somewhere on the Internet if the package gets accepted. These should be much more useful than documenting classes that will not be used directly most of the time (if not always). I just don't feel like documenting them at the moment, but I thought this package might still be useful, even if not fully documented. And after all, this is open-source, I am not against some help with documentation, tutorials, unit tests, code, etc.
That's what I would like to have done in order to have this vote +1You voted +1. You should have voted -1 if this is an issue for you ?
Also, I didn't have a chance to comment (Totally missed it) and I was wondering why we are not calling this package Net_URL_Router like *Every* other packages do basically. Is that to confuse people ?I don't find the concept of Mapper confusing. I find the concept of Router confusing. But English is not my mother's tongue. If users prefer Router, I can change that, it doesn't really matters to me (except I am already using Mapper in large development code, so I will have to grep all that).