Re: how the new PEAR government might work
| From: | Justin Patrin | Date: | Thu, 15 Mar 2007 01:12:54 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: how the new PEAR government might work | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-45911@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On 3/14/07, Chuck Burgess <demon.gene@gmail.com> wrote:
Ah yes, the importance of feedback when there's no critique involved from me... I like it. Your distillation that started this thread was very good, for me, in that it demonstrated the various positions in action, which helped round out my mental picture of them all.Ditto.
+1 on the implementation plan+1 as well
+2 on adding the abstract to the constitution text (do I need to buy that extra vote from someone on vacation ;)You can have my +1 to round out your +2. ;-)
Sometimes I get in "sounds good, waiting to see what's next" mode, forgetting that a "sound good" means alot in and of itself. I guess the only thing I might add is the thought that came to me as I was reading this thread and its responses --- would PEPr be a reasonable in-place-already method of handling the elections themselves, as well as other must-make-a-decision steps? Or is it hardcoded/hardcolumned to only manage software stuff? CRB-- Justin Patrin