Re: how the new PEAR government might work
| From: | Chuck Burgess | Date: | Wed, 14 Mar 2007 11:26:30 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: how the new PEAR government might work | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-45906@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Ah yes, the importance of feedback when there's no critique involved from
me...
I like it. Your distillation that started this thread was very good, for
me, in that it demonstrated the various positions in action, which helped
round out my mental picture of them all.
+1 on the implementation plan
+2 on adding the abstract to the constitution text (do I need to buy that
extra vote from someone on vacation ;)
Sometimes I get in "sounds good, waiting to see what's next" mode,
forgetting that a "sound good" means alot in and of itself. I guess the
only thing I might add is the thought that came to me as I was reading this
thread and its responses --- would PEPr be a reasonable in-place-already
method of handling the elections themselves, as well as other
must-make-a-decision steps? Or is it hardcoded/hardcolumned to only manage
software stuff?
CRB