Why naming folders TYPE_Package indstead of TYPE/Package?

From: Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 15:04:14 +0000
Subject: Why naming folders TYPE_Package indstead of TYPE/Package?
Groups: php.pear.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-4673@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Hi - I know that PFC and "normal" classes are separeted into php4/pear/ and pear/ because PFC are going to be bundled with PHP, but: Why not keep the samme structure in pear/ as php4/pear/ had? I really can't see any advantages but it makes it at lot more complicated to get updated through CVS. -- Mvh./Best Regards Jonas Delfs, http://delfs.dk

« previous php.pear.dev (#4673) next »