Re: Why naming folders TYPE_Package indstead of TYPE/Package?
| From: | Jonas Delfs | Date: | Wed, 13 Feb 2002 15:16:26 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Why naming folders TYPE_Package indstead of TYPE/Package? | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-4675@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hi,
> On Wed, 13 Feb 2002 16:04:14 +0100, Jonas Delfs wrote:
> >Why not keep the samme structure in pear/ as php4/pear/ had?
>
> That's answered in the FAQ and has been discussed on the list
> for several times in the past:
Oh - I'm sorry. I assumed the answer wasn't there because I've actually read
the whole FAQ (some time ago).
But I still have a question: What advantages is there in allowing a strange
structure in a package-directory? Why not keep it as it is going to be
installed and take the advantage of having the same structure in CVS and on
a server when installed? (CVS update)
--
Mvh./Best Regards
Jonas Delfs, http://delfs.dk