Re: Re: [PEPr] +1 for Encryption::Crypt_HMAC2

Sebastian, David requested as a condition that I move from extending PEAR_Exception to the base PHP5 Exception so it would be real PHP5. I interpreted it as meaning David believed PEAR_Exception to be a PHP4 package - which it's not - hence the spookiness ;). He corrected himself quickly thereafter - so ignore the comment. It was only in jest. Paddy Pádraic Brady http://blog.astrumfutura.com http://www.patternsforphp.com ----- Original Message ---- From: Sebastian Mendel <lists@sebastianmendel.de> To: pear-dev@lists.php.net Sent: Wednesday, July 4, 2007 8:17:25 AM Subject: Re: [PEAR-DEV] Re: [PEPr] +1 for Encryption::Crypt_HMAC2 Arnaud Limbourg schrieb: > Sebastian Mendel wrote: >> Pádraic Brady schrieb: >>> I was beginning to wonder when they got exceptions in PHP4 ;). That >>> would have really spooked me! >> >> now I AM confused, does new PEAR packages require PHP 4 compatibility? > > No, david got confused, forget this comment :) yes, about using PHP or PEAR exceptions - right, but i was talking about > "I was beginning to wonder when they got exceptions in PHP4" why is it important/interesting if PHP 4 has exceptions or not? i read it like "i could not use Exception cause they are not exists/work in PHP 4" but Christian already confirmed: new PEAR packages does not require PHP 4 compatibility -- Sebastian Mendel www.sebastianmendel.de -- PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php ____________________________________________________________________________________ Expecting? Get great news right away with email Auto-Check. Try the Yahoo! Mail Beta. http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta/newmail_tools.html