Re: Benchmark results for require vs require_once with and without APC (hard numbers for the allfiles.php debate)
| From: | Arnaud Limbourg | Date: | Tue, 10 Jul 2007 20:58:07 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Benchmark results for require vs require_once with and without APC (hard numbers for the allfiles.php debate) | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-47417@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Travis Swicegood wrote:
require_once is the problem here. I have a feeling that anything that's implemented removing all require_once calls from PEAR2 is going to hang around the neck of the PEAR Group the way that PEAR_Error hangs around PEAR in general. Does no one remember how ugly if(PEAR::isError($someObj)) is in the code?I would like to point a major difference, we are having this discussion *before*. Nothing has been decided, that is the whole point of the RFC :) Arnaud.