Re: Quality assurance proposition for HTMLSax3
| From: | Romain Beauxis | Date: | Sun, 21 Oct 2007 17:27:37 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Quality assurance proposition for HTMLSax3 | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-48280@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Le Sunday 21 October 2007 18:00:12 Lukas Kahwe Smith, vous avez écrit :
> > Of course, a clear relicensing from original author would be nicer..
>
> Uhm well I thought the issue is that its not clear what license the
> code is released under. As a result its kinda hard to rely on a
> specific license in order to get the right to relicense ..
Of course it's the issue.
But headers talk about two different licenses: they say, basically:
"version 2.02 of PHP license, as stated at
link to version 3"
So I guess it's either one or the other, but the two have this clause, so it
should hold.
However, yes we need a proper relicensing.
Romain
--
Think the word peace means coming together ?
Peace is a diploma you get in the cementry
Seen ?
On top of your grave, that is marked:
"Here lies the body of John Strokes
Rest in Peace"
Seen ?
And I and I know many of you little brothers,
Who wouldn't like to hear your daughter say:
"Just going to give away a little peace"
A Bongo cliping ya no seen ?
So you can imagine how defective the word peace is,
Seen ?
- Peter Tosh - Live at One Live Peace Concert '78