Re: Quality assurance proposition for HTMLSax3

From: Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 17:27:37 +0000
Subject: Re: Quality assurance proposition for HTMLSax3
References: 1 2 3  Groups: php.pear.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-48280@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Le Sunday 21 October 2007 18:00:12 Lukas Kahwe Smith, vous avez écrit : > > Of course, a clear relicensing from original author would be nicer.. > > Uhm well I thought the issue is that its not clear what license the   > code is released under. As a result its kinda hard to rely on a   > specific license in order to get the right to relicense .. Of course it's the issue. But headers talk about two different licenses: they say, basically: "version 2.02 of PHP license, as stated at link to version 3" So I guess it's either one or the other, but the two have this clause, so it should hold. However, yes we need a proper relicensing. Romain -- Think the word peace means coming together ? Peace is a diploma you get in the cementry Seen ? On top of your grave, that is marked: "Here lies the body of John Strokes Rest in Peace" Seen ? And I and I know many of you little brothers, Who wouldn't like to hear your daughter say: "Just going to give away a little peace" A Bongo cliping ya no seen ? So you can imagine how defective the word peace is, Seen ? - Peter Tosh - Live at One Live Peace Concert '78

« previous php.pear.dev (#48280) next »