Re: no chance of multiple namespaces per file

You sure you didn't forget to email the mailing list too ? :) Anyway either way enforce it everywhere or skip it all together, allowing people to pick will be a MESSSSSSS IMHO :) - Helgi On Dec 4, 2007 8:20 PM, Tony Bibbs <tony@tonybibbs.com> wrote: > I missed the entire put-it-all-in-one-file discussion but my take is that > if supporting put-it-all-in-one-file is optional then using those packages > choosing to support that should explicitly not support namespaces. Maybe > this is something that can be enforced during packaging? > > --Tony > > ----- Original Message ---- > From: Helgi Þormar Þorbjörnsson <helgith@gmail.com> > To: Gregory Beaver <greg@chiaraquartet.net> > Cc: PEAR Announce <pear-dev@lists.php.net> > Sent: Tuesday, December 4, 2007 1:49:27 PM > Subject: Re: [PEAR-DEV] no chance of multiple namespaces per file > > > On Dec 4, 2007 7:42 PM, Gregory Beaver <greg@chiaraquartet.net> wrote: > > > hi all, > > > > There's no chance of multiple namespaces per file. If that's an > issue, > > we can drop namespaces (meaning forbid their usage) from the coding > > requirements in PEAR2. > > > > Comments? > > > Isn't it quite useless to jump on the NS bandwagon if we can't support > the > whole put everything in a one big heap of a file approach ? > Makes me wonder if we shouldn't just drop it. > > - Helgi > > > >