Re: Get list of all available packages
| From: | Helgi Þormar Þorbjörnsson | Date: | Fri, 04 Jan 2008 20:06:52 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Get list of all available packages | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-48861@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hi
On Jan 4, 2008 7:29 PM, Markus Fischer <markus@fischer.name> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi,
>
> there was never a list of "all packages" (which I would really like to
> have*) but at least I could help myself by doing an empty search which
> resulted in a result of all packages split onto 10 entries per page.
>
> Now this doesn't seem to work anymore, an empty search string on
> http://pear.php.net/search.php gives no package back ... :/
And here's the weird thing, search.php has not changed for 2 and a half year
:)
Can you file a bug report against the pearweb package and I'll get on it.
>
> * I like the feature because I find it convenient to just browse through
> everything which is available, the individual categories come close but
> are (of course) limited again.
>
> I'm also a big fan of "show all results in one page", having to click
> zillions time on "next" just to see all packages I something I don't
> consider very usable.
Doing the show all results per page thing can cause a bit of load to a
server, tho I might add something like the bug system, a drop down with 10
20 30 40 50 60 and All, again could you file a feature request for it on
pearweb ? :)
>
> Something like http://pear.php.net/package-stats.php is very
> nice,
> though I don't understand why it's a scrollable area inside the page and
> ~ not just uses the page itself for it ... but if that list could be made
> alphabetically (not particular this one, as it would defeat the purpose
> of the page) somewhere, that would be great.
The scroller is old stuff, I think it was so the table header would always
be visible ya know, wonder if people feel like seeing that is required or
not, comments ?
>
> Besides that (and before everything hates me because I'm only
> criticizing :) the changes look refreshing and very good :)
Well it was the good kind of criticizing you just did, thanks and thanks for
the compliment, the web team thanks you :)
Regards
Helgi