Re: Pearweb vs xhtml

Hi All > I'm not sure that you should be suggesting this since setting up pearweb > is > not as trivial as one might wish, especially for new comers :) You can say that again! I managed to get pearweb and pearweb_index running on ubuntu after some trial and error... if you want I can look at writing up some notes on what I did to get it running? I suggest that people don't go too trigger happy and spend too much time on > this, most of the reports you're talking about are things like & isn't > & > in urls, name="" being used in forms (bugs.php) we're in Strict mode so > it's > understandable that we get validation issues and I'm still in the process > of > refactoring the HTML behind pearweb, accounts.php is one place that I > didn't > touch, packages.php is another. > > Now I'm not saying people should not help, by all means do help :-) Just > the > fact that we are in the process of changing the layout and thus the HTML > and > CSS behind pearweb, as some people might have noticed, then a patch might > get invalid pretty fast since the last pearweb release was only the first > in > series of layout improvements. As a test to ensure I can still use CVS (I now use subversion mostly for work) I have added a patch to the bug report above which is against HEAD and will fix a few XHTML related errors on the following pages public_html/group/index.php public_html/news/index.php public_html/support/forums.php public_html/support/icons.php public_html/support/slides.php I would be grateful if someone could take a look to make sure I did it right and if so I have some more patches I can provide which will help make installing pearweb much easier. Thanks in advance Mark