Re: Re: PEAR in PHP releases
| From: | Martin Jansen | Date: | Sat, 16 Mar 2002 18:10:14 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: PEAR in PHP releases | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-4992@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Sat, 16 Mar 2002 17:07:15 +0100, Tomas V.V.Cox wrote:
>I would prefer a mix of both systems, this is, someone told us (Derick?
>;-) that a new php release is coming for the day X and we then start our
>QA process. Once it's done we merge all the changes to the branch and
>let pear ready for other QA processes and final corrections during the
>RCs.
But what will happen, if the QA guys tell us that they will role a
RC in x days, but you don't have the time to merge the changes in
the release branch?
>I would prefer to spend one evening on QA than merging each time to
>branch, but it's just my opinion.
IMHO it makes more sense to do the work on time (when comitting to
the HEAD branch), instead of doing the same task at two different
times.
- Martin
--
Martin Jansen, <mail@martin-jansen.de>
http://www.martin-jansen.de/