Re: PEAR2 package naming standards (namespace usage)
| From: | Paul M Jones | Date: | Wed, 27 Aug 2008 18:48:43 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: PEAR2 package naming standards (namespace usage) | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-50656@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Aug 27, 2008, at 12:03 , Joshua Eichorn wrote:
We are currently proposing a flat namespace, so its just <vendor>::<package>::<packagestuff> There has been some talk about having categories before package but I we are really pushing for consistency so if we went the category route all packages would need to be in a category. <vendor>::<cateogry>::<package>::<packagestuff>I am intuitively against the inclusion of "category" in the namespace. Vendor and package name is plenty good, I think. -- Paul M. Jones http://paul-m-jones.com/