Re: PEAR2 package naming standards (namespace usage)
| From: | Joe Stump | Date: | Wed, 27 Aug 2008 18:54:59 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: PEAR2 package naming standards (namespace usage) | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-50657@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Aug 27, 2008, at 11:48 AM, Paul M Jones wrote:
When Travis and I chatted about it pointed out that category was redundant since it'd be in the package name (e.g. Why use pear2::http::http_request when pear2::http_request would suffice?) --Joe<vendor>::<cateogry>::<package>::<packagestuff>I am intuitively against the inclusion of "category" in the namespace. Vendor and package name is plenty good, I think.