Re: [PEPr] +1 for Logging::Log_FirePHP

Laurent, On Sat, 2008-12-13 at 11:43 +0100, Laurent Laville wrote: > > If you have questions about making this into a PEAR package, > > #pear or pear-dev@ can direct you. > > I don't need support to build a package with PEAR_PackageFileManager > (and even from scratch), perharps because I've worked in past as a > co-leader in its development. What a mistake to make! Thank you for your work on PackageFileManager. > > You should have in mind what I've wrote in proposal introduction > > "This proposal is not supposed to be a new package but a driver for > existing PEAR::Log package" > > So it could be included and packaged in next version. > > No new package or sub-package ! Okay, I've taken a look at the PEAR::Log package and now I understand how this proposal fits in. Originally, I thought this was to be an independent sub-package. You can consider my vote non-conditional now :) > > Additionally, this package depends on a non-PEAR package and I'm > > not sure what PEAR's stance is on that. > > > > Even if Coding Standard have been changed since, PEAR::Log is an old > package and probably not follow all rules established now with new PEAR > CS (especially for new PHP5 development). I see FirePHPCore has a pear channel at pear.firephp.org. Perhaps PEAR::Log could list the FirePHPCore package as an optional dependency when this proposal is accepted. > This FirePHP driver run only with PHP5 but was written as a PHP4 driver > to be supported and integrated easily into PEAR::Log framework. > > Hope I've answered to all your questions You have, thanks, Mike